THE NEUROSCIENCE OF CREATIVITY: How the Brain Generates Innovative Ideas
- Marcela Emilia Silva do Valle Pereira Ma Emilia
- 15 hours ago
- 10 min read

🧠 The Neuroscience of Creativity
Creativity, long considered a mystical gift or a characteristic exclusive to artists and geniuses, has been progressively demystified by modern neuroscience.
What once seemed to be a magical and inexplicable phenomenon reveals itself today as the result of complex and measurable neurobiological processes that occur in our brain. Creativity has ceased to be merely an artistic talent to become a strategic competence — in science, in the marketplace, and in everyday life.
And here is the fascinating point:
👉 Creativity is not magic — it is biology.
🔍 Creativity is not "divine inspiration" — it is neural architecture

The idea that creativity comes from a magical spark is beautiful, but it does not do justice to the human brain.
Understanding how the brain produces creativity not only helps us to value this fundamental human capacity but also opens doors to the development of strategies that can enhance creative and innovative thinking.
Creativity can be defined as the capacity to produce something that is simultaneously new (original) and useful (appropriate to the context in which it is inserted).
From a neurological point of view, neuroscience shows that creativity is a distributed, coordinated, and extremely sophisticated process in a dynamic of multiple cognitive processes:
Divergent thinking — generation of multiple solutions to a problem
Convergent thinking — selection and refinement of the best solution
Cognitive flexibility — capacity to alternate between different perspectives
Associative memory — connection of apparently unrelated information
Executive control — evaluation and implementation of ideas
These processes, which do not occur in a single isolated brain region, emerge from the coordinated interaction of various neural networks distributed throughout the brain.
And it is precisely this complex orchestration that makes creativity so powerful — and so human.
🧩 The three major brain networks of creativity

Creating something original requires the dynamic cooperation of three major neural networks, which alternate like a perfect innovation team:
1. Default Mode Network (DMN)
This imagination network is activated when we are not focused on external tasks and our mind is "wandering" freely, in mental "reverie", in free creativity.
The DMN includes: • Medial prefrontal cortex
• Posterior cingulate cortex
• Inferior parietal lobe
• Hippocampus
This is when spontaneous generation of ideas, autobiographical thinking, mental simulation, and free associations occur.
It is during these moments of daydreaming that unexpected creative insights frequently emerge — those brilliant ideas that seem to come from nowhere.
2. Executive Control Network (ECN)
This is the rational network, activated during tasks that require focused attention, planning, and decision-making.
It includes: • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
• Posterior parietal cortex
It is our network for evaluating, refining, and implementing creative ideas.
The ECN helps us to filter inadequate ideas and to develop the most promising ones, transforming creative insights into practical and viable solutions.
3. Salience Network (SN)
This network acts as a "switch" between the other networks, determining what deserves attention at each moment.
Composed of: • Anterior insula
• Anterior cingulate cortex
Its role is to detect relevant information in the internal and external environment, facilitating alternation between spontaneous thinking (DMN) and focused thinking (ECN).
It is through this system that one decides which idea is worth pursuing, refining, or discarding.
✨ The secret of highly creative brains: flexible coupling

Traditionally, it was believed that the DMN and ECN were antagonistic — when one was active, the other was inhibited.
But recent research, including important work by researchers such as Carolina di Bernardi Luft, has revealed something surprising:
👉 Highly creative people demonstrate a unique capacity to co-activate these networks.
This phenomenon, known as "flexible coupling", allows:
Generating original ideas (DMN) whilst maintaining focus on the objective (ECN)
Alternating fluidly between exploration of possibilities and critical evaluation
Integrating information from multiple sources in a coherent and productive manner
In other words:
✨ The creative brain does not choose between dreaming and doing — it does both simultaneously.
Studies by Beaty et al. (2016; 2018) show that people with high creativity present stronger functional connectivity between DMN + Executive Network — a paradoxical combination, but essential for innovation.
Furthermore, Luft and colleagues (2018) demonstrated that transcranial stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex can relax learnt cognitive constraints, increasing creative flexibility.
This suggests that creativity is not merely a fixed characteristic, but a capacity that can be modulated and developed.
🧬 Neurotransmitters in creativity: the chemistry of innovation

Creativity is not merely a question of neural networks — it also depends on chemical messengers that modulate our thinking.
🎨 Dopamine — the fuel of creativity
Dopamine plays a central role in creativity, especially in divergent thinking.
This neurotransmitter, already well known as the pleasure hormone, facilitates cognitive flexibility, promotes the formation of new associations, increases intrinsic motivation, and is associated with the experience of "flow".
When dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex are moderate, they appear to optimise creativity, whilst very low or very high levels can impair it.
⚡ Noradrenaline — the regulator of creative attention
Noradrenaline, the activating chemical substance, modulates attention and the state of alertness, influencing the capacity to maintain focus during the creative process, regulating the response to novel and unexpected stimuli, and consolidating creative memories.
🌊 Serotonin — the modulator of creative mood
Serotonin, which can act as both an excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter, affects mood and mental flexibility to maintain these balanced levels by promoting positive thinking and openness to new experiences, influences the capacity to overcome mental fixations, and also modulates impulsivity in the generation of ideas.
🧠 The myth of the "creative right brain"

You have probably heard that creative people use the right hemisphere of the brain more, haven't you?
Well, as beautiful as the images may be, this is not the truth. The truth?
👉 This is an excessive simplification — and scientifically imprecise.
The reality is more "nuanced":
The Left Hemisphere actually has an important participation in the creative process, mainly because it is there that processing related to the logical and realistic occurs. These include analytical and sequential processing, language and verbal reasoning, convergent thinking, amongst others.
And in the Right Hemisphere is where the madness happens, and that is why this myth was created. It is in this hemisphere that there is truly the visualisation of the idea, where there is the starting point for the creation of the idea, because it is the region that does holistic and spatial processing of the surroundings to recognise visual patterns, following the processing of metaphors and humour.
That is to say, whilst the right hemisphere goes off on a tangent, goes to the moon, the left hemisphere returns to Earth and puts the idea into words/realistic possibilities to be applied.
The truth then:
✨ Genuine creativity requires the integration of both hemispheres.
The corpus callosum, the structure that connects the hemispheres, allows information to flow between them, facilitating the combination of analytical and holistic processing necessary for full creativity.
Studies show that people with greater inter-hemispheric connectivity tend to present greater creative capacity (Beaty et al., 2016).
🎭 The four phases of the creative process in the brain

Creativity itself does not happen all at once — it unfolds in distinct phases, each with its own neural signature.
Phase 1: Preparation
Neural Activity: Activation of the ECN and regions of the temporal lobe related to semantic memory.
This is the phase that creates the first alert in the brain to activate creativity. Therefore it needs to:
Absorb relevant information
Activate prior knowledge
Establish the problem or challenge to be resolved
👉 This is where the problem, study, research, and immersion in context begins.
Phase 2: Incubation
Neural Activity: Predominance of the DMN, with reduction of activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
The phase that begins to reason about the problem without necessarily actively working on it, doing:
Unconscious processing of information
Formation of remote associations
Reorganisation of memories
Here the brain works behind the scenes, connecting ideas in unexpected ways — even when it is not consciously thinking about the problem, it is.
Phase 3: Illumination (Insight)
Neural Activity: Explosion of activity in the right superior temporal gyrus, accompanied by gamma waves (and from where the myth arose that the right hemisphere is the creative side).
The marvellous "Aha" moment occurs (poof). That moment when the idea is created, the solution is in sight, and the brain is organised. There is a:
Sudden reorganisation of information
Activation of the reward system (release of dopamine)
Sensation of clarity and certainty about the solution found
It is a magical moment when everything falls into place, the mental orgasm (a release of dopamine with the sensation of relief, goosebumps on the skin, total relaxation, cerebral meltdown) — usually when you are in the shower, walking home, walking the dog, or about to fall asleep. And you cannot share it with anyone, give that leap in the air, or celebrate the goal à la Cristiano Ronaldo. (Good heavens)
Phase 4: Verification
Neural Activity: Reactivation of the ECN, especially the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
And then everything returns to normal, right? But this is the most important part of the process, because without this phase the idea may be creative, but without utility. So, the brain:
Evaluates the viability of the idea
Refines and elaborates the solution
Plans its practical implementation
This is when one tests, adjusts, and transforms the insight into something concrete and applicable. It is the delivery; it is the materialisation of creation. It is the product of creativity, the idea.
💫 The state of Flow: when the creative brain reaches its peak

Described by psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, flow is a state of total immersion in a creative activity. That is, when one concentrates so much on the activity that one pays no attention to the surroundings and the environment is also not interfering with one's work process.
The neural correlates of flow occur through transient hypofrontality — temporary reduction of activity in the prefrontal cortex, increasing theta waves in the frontal cortex, which releases neurotransmitters such as dopamine, noradrenaline, and endorphins responsible for the individual's well-being and pleasure.
For example, during flow, the brain temporarily switches off its internal "critical voice", allowing creativity to flow without self-censorship.
Conditions for Achieving Flow:
Balance between challenge and skill
Clear objectives
Immediate feedback
Elimination of personal distractions
When these conditions align, the brain enters a state of maximum efficiency — producing high-quality creative work with a sensation of minimal effort.
🔮 The future of the neuroscience of creativity

Creativity is still an area that arouses much curiosity in the scientific community. From its form of creation to knowing whether there is synchronicity between the brains of two or more participants during a collaborative creative activity, investigations and research on creativity are in full expansion, and the future promises fascinating discoveries.
Advanced Neuroimaging
Functional connectivity techniques in real time
Longitudinal studies of creative development
Mapping of brain networks in high resolution
Neuromodulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Neurofeedback to train creative brain states
Ethical questions about "cognitive enhancement"
In one of their studies, for example, Luft et al. (2018) demonstrated that cathodal tDCS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex can increase creativity by relaxing cognitive constraints — although this raises important questions about the ethical limits of neuromodulation.
Artificial Intelligence and Creativity
Computational models of creative processes
AI as a tool to amplify human creativity
Comparisons between human and artificial creativity
Can AI generate "creative" content — but can it truly create something new and significant? Or does it merely recombine what already exists?
Interdisciplinary Approaches
Integration of neuroscience, psychology, education, and the arts
Ecological studies of creativity in real contexts
Understanding collective and collaborative creativity
✨ Conclusion

The neuroscience of creativity reveals that the human brain is extraordinarily capable of generating innovative ideas through complex and fascinating mechanisms.
Understanding how the brain produces creativity does not diminish its magic — on the contrary, it amplifies our admiration for the complexity of the most sophisticated organ in the known universe.
👉 Creativity is not a switch we turn on or off — it is a capacity that can be nurtured, developed, and refined throughout life.
The future of human creativity lies not only in better understanding our brain, but in applying this knowledge to create societies, education systems, and cultures that allow each individual to flourish in their unique creative potential.
And perhaps the most powerful insight of all is this:
✨ You already have a creative brain. The question is not whether you can be creative — it is how you will nurture this extraordinary capacity that already exists within you.
📚 References in APA Format (7th edition)
· Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004
· Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins.
· Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019749
· Jung, R. E., & Vartanian, O. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
· Kaufman, S. B., & Gregoire, C. (2015). Wired to create: Unravelling the mysteries of the creative mind. TarcherPerigee.
· Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154
· Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001679
· Luft, C. D. B., Zioga, I., Banissy, M. J., & Bhattacharya, J. (2018). Relaxing learned constraints through cathodal tDCS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 3916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22022-6
· Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
· Sawyer, K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
· Tang, Y. Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916
· Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., & Born, J. (2004). Sleep inspires insight. Nature, 427(6972), 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02223
· Wieth, M. B., & Zacks, R. T. (2011). Time of day effects on problem solving: When the non-optimal is optimal. Thinking & Reasoning, 17(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2011.625663



Comments